Quality of port infrastructure, WEF (1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by international standards) - Transportation - Infrastructure - World Development Indicators



Other country level comparisons:
TotalPer 100,000 population
Choose year:   2009 2008 2007
Loading map, please wait...

Less → More


The Quality of Port Infrastructure measures business executives' perception of their country's port facilities. Data are from the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey, conducted for 30 years in collaboration with 150 partner institutes. The 2009 round included more than 13,000 respondents from 133 countries. Sampling follows a dual stratification based on company size and the sector of activity. Data are collected online or through in-person interviews. Responses are aggregated using sector-weighted averaging. The data for the latest year are combined with the data for the previous year to create a two-year moving average. Scores range from 1 (port infrastructure considered extremely underdeveloped) to 7 (port infrastructure considered efficient by international standards). Respondents in landlocked countries were asked how accessible are port facilities (1 = extremely inaccessible; 7 = extremely accessible).
Quality of port infrastructure, WEF (1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by international standards) - Transportation - Infrastructure - World Development Indicators (2009)

Rank

Country

Value

1Hong Kong6.78
2Singapore6.78
3Netherlands6.60
4Finland6.45
5Germany6.38
6Belgium6.34
7United Arab Emirates6.24
8Iceland6.23
9Denmark6.22
10France5.89
11Sweden5.87
12Norway5.79
13United States5.67
14Canada5.61
15Estonia5.60
16Bahrain5.55
17Panama5.54
18Malaysia5.52
19Luxembourg5.52
20Barbados5.49
21New Zealand5.47
22Malta5.44
23Namibia5.42
24Puerto Rico5.40
25Switzerland5.40
26Chile5.36
27High income: OECD5.29
28Jamaica5.27
29High income5.27
30Euro area5.27
31Slovenia5.25
32Cyprus5.25
33High income: nonOECD5.24
34United Kingdom5.22
35Oman5.19
36Spain5.18
37Japan5.17
38Honduras5.12
39South Korea5.10
40North Korea5.10
41Qatar4.99
42Austria4.98
43Ivory Coast4.96
44Uruguay4.88
45Tunisia4.87
46Brunei Darussalam4.83
47Sri Lanka4.79
48Lithuania4.73
49Saudi Arabia4.72
50Portugal4.72
51Thailand4.69
52Gambia4.67
53South Africa4.66
54Australia4.65
55Israel4.59
56Jordan4.51
57Ireland4.44
58Senegal4.43
59Zimbabwe4.42
60Latvia4.40
61Egypt4.32
62Guatemala4.30
63Dominican Republic4.30
64Mauritius4.29
65China4.28
66Morocco4.24
67Azerbaijan4.20
68El Salvador4.17
69Czech Republic4.16
70Greece4.14
71Slovakia4.12
72Kuwait4.11
73Ghana4.04
74Burkina Faso4
75Georgia4
76Trinidad and Tobago3.98
77Pakistan3.96
78Hungary3.93
79Middle East & North Africa3.91
80Ethiopia3.77
81Mali3.77
82Latin America & Caribbean3.75
83Croatia3.75
84Upper middle income3.75
85Turkey3.74
86Middle income3.72
87Botswana3.72
88Ukraine3.71
89Sub-Saharan Africa3.71
90Zambia3.70
91Lower middle income3.70
92Mexico3.67
93Italy3.66
94East Asia & Pacific3.65
95Kenya3.65
96Argentina3.64
97Low & middle income3.63
98Bulgaria3.62
99South Asia3.61
100Russia3.55
101Malawi3.53
102Cambodia3.50
103Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)3.49
104Mauritania3.47
105India3.47
106Paraguay3.47
107Uganda3.44
108Macedonia3.41
109Indonesia3.40
110Low income3.38
111Least developed countries: UN classification3.37
112Ecuador3.34
113Suriname3.32
114Benin3.31
115Vietnam3.28
116Montenegro3.28
117Europe & Central Asia3.27
118Serbia3.27
119Syria3.26
120Romania3.26
121Libya3.25
122Albania3.22
123Colombia3.21
124Guyana3.21
125Mozambique3.20
126Burundi3.09
127Kazakhstan3.03
128Madagascar3.03
129Philippines3
130Lesotho2.98
131Bangladesh2.98
132Bolivia2.95
133Mongolia2.94
134Armenia2.91
135Algeria2.90
136Nepal2.83
137Tanzania2.82
138Poland2.82
139Nigeria2.80
140Cameroon2.72
141Nicaragua2.69
142Chad2.66
143Peru2.66
144Brazil2.65
145Costa Rica2.57
146Venezuela2.42
147Timor-Leste2.26
148Tajikistan1.94
149Kyrgyzstan1.60
150Bosnia and Herzegovina1.50
Country Comparison Graph