In practice, is the internal mechanism (i.e. phone hotline, e-mail address, local office) through which civil servants can report corruption effective? - Global Integrity Index - Actionable Governance Indicators

Other country level comparisons:

Choose year: 2009 2008 2007 2006

Loading map, please wait...

Less → More

Rank	Country	Value
In practice, is the internal mechanism (i.e. phone hotline, e-mail address, local office) through which civil servants can report corruption effective? - Global Integrity Index - Actionable Governance Indicators (2009)
1	Belarus	100
2	Kazakhstan	100
3	Indonesia	94
4	Timor-Leste	88
5	Jordan	88
6	Latvia	88
7	Poland	88
8	Egypt	88
9	Sierra Leone	81
10	Benin	75
11	Philippines	75
12	Bangladesh	69
13	Rwanda	69
14	Vanuatu	69
15	Costa Rica	63
16	Azerbaijan	63
17	Kenya	63
18	China	63
19	Mongolia	63
20	Thailand	63
21	Bulgaria	62
22	Ethiopia	62
23	Mexico	56
24	Georgia	56
25	South Africa	56
26	Moldova	50
27	Pakistan	50
28	Colombia	50
29	Zimbabwe	50
30	Brazil	50
31	Uganda	50
32	Malawi	50
33	Namibia	44
34	Nepal	44
35	India	44
36	Venezuela	44
37	Cambodia	38
38	Romania	38
39	Kyrgyzstan	38
40	Ecuador	38
41	Turkey	38
42	Yemen	38
43	Cameroon	31
44	Peru	31
45	Nicaragua	25
46	Ghana	25
47	Democratic Republic of the Congo	25
48	Sri Lanka	25
49	St. Vincent and the Grenadines	25
50	Tajikistan	25
51	Tanzania	25
52	Lithuania	25
53	Argentina	19
54	Macedonia	13
55	Nigeria	12
56	Iraq	12
57	Bosnia and Herzegovina	0
58	Burundi	0
59	Somalia	0
60	Guatemala	0
61	Chile	0
62	Algeria	0
63	Morocco	0
64	Mozambique	0
65	Liberia	0
66	Lebanon	0
67	Angola	0
68	Montenegro	0
69	Ukraine	0
70	Russia	0
71	Armenia	0
72	Vietnam	0
73	West Bank and Gaza	0
74	Senegal	0
75	Serbia	0

Country Comparison Graph

Encyclopedia of the Nations