Quality of budgetary & financial management rating (1=low to 6=high) - CPIA Public Sector Management and Institutions - Governance & partnership - Development outcomes - African Development Indicators

Other country level comparisons:

Choose year: 2008 2007 2006 2005

Loading map, please wait...

Less → More

Quality of budgetary and financial management assesses the extent to which there is a comprehensive and credible budget linked to policy priorities, effective financial management systems, and timely and accurate accounting and fiscal reporting, including timely and audited public accounts. Source: World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).

Rank	Country	Value
Quality of budgetary & financial management rating (1=low to 6=high) - CPIA Public Sector Management and Institutions - Governance & partnership - Development outcomes - African Development Indicators (2008)
1	Burkina Faso	4
2	Cape Verde	4
3	Ethiopia	4
4	Ghana	4
5	Rwanda	4
6	Uganda	4
7	Madagascar	3.50
8	Benin	3.50
9	Mozambique	3.50
10	Mali	3.50
11	Kenya	3.50
12	Niger	3.50
13	Sierra Leone	3.50
14	Tanzania	3.50
15	Zambia	3.50
16	Burundi	3
17	Mauritania	3
18	Cameroon	3
19	Lesotho	3
20	Djibouti	3
21	Guinea	3
22	Gambia	3
23	Malawi	3
24	Nigeria	3
25	Senegal	3
26	Sao Tome and Principe	3
27	Guinea-Bissau	2.50
28	Angola	2.50
29	Republic of the Congo	2.50
30	Democratic Republic of the Congo	2.50
31	Eritrea	2.50
32	Chad	2
33	Togo	2
34	Sudan	2
35	Ivory Coast	2
36	Central African Republic	2
37	Comoros	1.50
38	Zimbabwe	1.50

Country Comparison Graph

Encyclopedia of the Nations

Quality of budgetary & financial management rating (1=low to 6=high) - CPIA Public Sector Management and Institutions - Governance & partnership - Development outcomes - African Development Indicators

Rank

Country

Value