CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high) - Policy & institutions - Public Sector - World Development Indicators

Other country level comparisons:

Choose year: 2008 2007 2006 2005

Loading map, please wait...

Less → More

Quality of public administration assesses the extent to which civilian central government staff is structured to design and implement government policy and deliver services effectively.

Rank	Country	Value
CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high) - Policy & institutions - Public Sector - World Development Indicators (2008)
1	Samoa	4
2	Armenia	4
3	Maldives	4
4	Bhutan	4
5	Cape Verde	4
6	Georgia	4
7	Dominica	3.50
8	Moldova	3.50
9	Vietnam	3.50
10	Mongolia	3.50
11	Burkina Faso	3.50
12	Grenada	3.50
13	Malawi	3.50
14	St. Vincent and the Grenadines	3.50
15	Tanzania	3.50
16	Madagascar	3.50
17	Tonga	3.50
18	Senegal	3.50
19	Rwanda	3.50
20	Pakistan	3.50
21	India	3.50
22	Kenya	3.50
23	Ghana	3.50
24	St. Lucia	3.50
25	Azerbaijan	3
26	Benin	3
27	Bangladesh	3
28	Bosnia and Herzegovina	3
29	Bolivia	3
30	Cameroon	3
31	Eritrea	3
32	Ethiopia	3
33	Guinea	3
34	Gambia	3
35	Kyrgyzstan	3
36	Kiribati	3
37	Laos	3
38	Honduras	3
39	Lesotho	3
40	Mali	3
41	Mozambique	3
42	Mauritania	3
43	Sri Lanka	3
44	Niger	3
45	Nigeria	3
46	Nicaragua	3
47	Nepal	3
48	Uganda	3
49	Sao Tome and Principe	3
50	Uzbekistan	3
51	Vanuatu	3
52	Yemen	3
53	Zambia	3
54	Djibouti	2.50
55	Sudan	2.50
56	Guinea-Bissau	2.50
57	Sierra Leone	2.50
58	Haiti	2.50
59	Chad	2.50
60	Tajikistan	2.50
61	Timor-Leste	2.50
62	Republic of the Congo	2.50
63	Guyana	2.50
64	Central African Republic	2.50
65	Burundi	2.50
66	Cambodia	2.50
67	Angola	2.50
68	Papua New Guinea	2.50
69	Comoros	2
70	Togo	2
71	Ivory Coast	2
72	Solomon Islands	2
73	Afghanistan	2
74	Democratic Republic of the Congo	2
75	Zimbabwe	1

Country Comparison Graph

Encyclopedia of the Nations

CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high) - Policy & institutions - Public Sector - World Development Indicators

Rank

Country

Value