Logistics performance index: Overall (1=low to 5=high) - Trade facilitation - Private Sector & Trade - World Development Indicators
Other country level comparisons:
Loading map, please wait...
Less → More
Logistics Performance Index overall score reflects perceptions of a country's logistics based on efficiency of customs clearance process, quality of trade- and transport-related infrastructure, ease of arranging competitively priced shipments, quality of logistics services, ability to track and trace consignments, and frequency with which shipments reach the consignee within the scheduled time. The index ranges from 1 to 5, with a higher score representing better performance. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Scores for the six areas are averaged across all respondents and aggregated to a single score using principal components analysis. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010).
Logistics performance index: Overall (1=low to 5=high) - Trade facilitation - Private Sector & Trade - World Development Indicators (2009) |
Rank | Country | Value |
1 | Germany | 4.11 |
2 | Singapore | 4.09 |
3 | Sweden | 4.08 |
4 | Netherlands | 4.07 |
5 | Luxembourg | 3.98 |
6 | Japan | 3.97 |
7 | Switzerland | 3.97 |
8 | United Kingdom | 3.95 |
9 | Belgium | 3.94 |
10 | Norway | 3.93 |
11 | Ireland | 3.89 |
12 | Finland | 3.89 |
13 | Hong Kong | 3.88 |
14 | Canada | 3.87 |
15 | United States | 3.86 |
16 | Denmark | 3.85 |
17 | Australia | 3.84 |
18 | France | 3.84 |
19 | Austria | 3.76 |
20 | High income: OECD | 3.73 |
21 | New Zealand | 3.65 |
22 | South Korea | 3.64 |
23 | North Korea | 3.64 |
24 | Italy | 3.64 |
25 | United Arab Emirates | 3.63 |
26 | Spain | 3.63 |
27 | Euro area | 3.57 |
28 | High income | 3.55 |
29 | Czech Republic | 3.51 |
30 | China | 3.49 |
31 | South Africa | 3.46 |
32 | Malaysia | 3.44 |
33 | Poland | 3.44 |
34 | Israel | 3.41 |
35 | Bahrain | 3.37 |
36 | Lebanon | 3.34 |
37 | Portugal | 3.34 |
38 | Thailand | 3.29 |
39 | Kuwait | 3.28 |
40 | Latvia | 3.25 |
41 | Slovakia | 3.24 |
42 | High income: nonOECD | 3.24 |
43 | Saudi Arabia | 3.22 |
44 | Turkey | 3.22 |
45 | Brazil | 3.20 |
46 | Iceland | 3.20 |
47 | Estonia | 3.16 |
48 | Philippines | 3.14 |
49 | Cyprus | 3.13 |
50 | Lithuania | 3.13 |
51 | India | 3.12 |
52 | Argentina | 3.10 |
53 | Chile | 3.09 |
54 | Mexico | 3.05 |
55 | Panama | 3.02 |
56 | Hungary | 2.99 |
57 | Greece | 2.96 |
58 | Vietnam | 2.96 |
59 | Qatar | 2.95 |
60 | Costa Rica | 2.91 |
61 | Slovenia | 2.87 |
62 | Senegal | 2.86 |
63 | Tunisia | 2.84 |
64 | Romania | 2.84 |
65 | Oman | 2.84 |
66 | Bulgaria | 2.83 |
67 | Kazakhstan | 2.83 |
68 | Malta | 2.82 |
69 | Uganda | 2.82 |
70 | Dominican Republic | 2.82 |
71 | Peru | 2.80 |
72 | Upper middle income | 2.80 |
73 | Benin | 2.79 |
74 | Uzbekistan | 2.79 |
75 | Honduras | 2.78 |
76 | Macedonia | 2.77 |
77 | Croatia | 2.77 |
78 | Colombia | 2.77 |
79 | Ecuador | 2.77 |
80 | Indonesia | 2.76 |
81 | Paraguay | 2.75 |
82 | Bahamas | 2.75 |
83 | Uruguay | 2.75 |
84 | Europe & Central Asia | 2.74 |
85 | Jordan | 2.74 |
86 | Latin America & Caribbean | 2.74 |
87 | Syria | 2.74 |
88 | Bangladesh | 2.74 |
89 | East Asia & Pacific | 2.73 |
90 | Mauritius | 2.72 |
91 | Middle income | 2.69 |
92 | Serbia | 2.69 |
93 | Venezuela | 2.68 |
94 | Democratic Republic of the Congo | 2.68 |
95 | El Salvador | 2.67 |
96 | Madagascar | 2.66 |
97 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 2.66 |
98 | Azerbaijan | 2.64 |
99 | Guatemala | 2.63 |
100 | Kyrgyzstan | 2.62 |
101 | Russia | 2.61 |
102 | Georgia | 2.61 |
103 | Egypt | 2.61 |
104 | Low & middle income | 2.61 |
105 | Togo | 2.60 |
106 | Tanzania | 2.60 |
107 | Middle East & North Africa | 2.60 |
108 | Guinea | 2.60 |
109 | Lower middle income | 2.59 |
110 | Haiti | 2.59 |
111 | Nigeria | 2.59 |
112 | Kenya | 2.59 |
113 | Yemen | 2.58 |
114 | Iran | 2.57 |
115 | Ukraine | 2.57 |
116 | Moldova | 2.57 |
117 | Cameroon | 2.55 |
118 | Niger | 2.54 |
119 | Nicaragua | 2.54 |
120 | Ivory Coast | 2.53 |
121 | Jamaica | 2.53 |
122 | Pakistan | 2.53 |
123 | Armenia | 2.52 |
124 | Bolivia | 2.51 |
125 | Turkmenistan | 2.49 |
126 | Chad | 2.49 |
127 | South Asia | 2.49 |
128 | Gambia | 2.49 |
129 | Republic of the Congo | 2.48 |
130 | Ghana | 2.47 |
131 | Albania | 2.46 |
132 | Laos | 2.46 |
133 | Comoros | 2.45 |
134 | Low income | 2.43 |
135 | Montenegro | 2.43 |
136 | Sub-Saharan Africa | 2.42 |
137 | Papua New Guinea | 2.41 |
138 | Ethiopia | 2.41 |
139 | Gabon | 2.41 |
140 | Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) | 2.41 |
141 | Maldives | 2.40 |
142 | Djibouti | 2.39 |
143 | Liberia | 2.38 |
144 | Bhutan | 2.38 |
145 | Least developed countries: UN classification | 2.38 |
146 | Cambodia | 2.37 |
147 | Algeria | 2.36 |
148 | Tajikistan | 2.35 |
149 | Libya | 2.33 |
150 | Burma | 2.33 |
151 | Botswana | 2.32 |
152 | Solomon Islands | 2.31 |
153 | Mozambique | 2.29 |
154 | Sri Lanka | 2.29 |
155 | Zambia | 2.28 |
156 | Mali | 2.27 |
157 | Guyana | 2.27 |
158 | Mongolia | 2.25 |
159 | Angola | 2.25 |
160 | Afghanistan | 2.24 |
161 | Fiji | 2.24 |
162 | Burkina Faso | 2.23 |
163 | Sudan | 2.21 |
164 | Nepal | 2.20 |
165 | Iraq | 2.11 |
166 | Guinea-Bissau | 2.10 |
167 | Cuba | 2.07 |
168 | Rwanda | 2.04 |
169 | Namibia | 2.02 |
170 | Sierra Leone | 1.97 |
171 | Eritrea | 1.70 |
172 | Somalia | 1.34 |
|
|