In practice, when necessary, the judicial disciplinary agency (or equivalent mechanism) imposes penalties on offenders. - Global Integrity Index - Actionable Governance Indicators

Other country level comparisons:

Choose year: 2009 2008 2007 2006

Loading map, please wait...

Less → More

Rank	Country	Value
In practice, when necessary, the judicial disciplinary agency (or equivalent mechanism) imposes penalties on offenders. - Global Integrity Index - Actionable Governance Indicators (2009)
1	Namibia	100
2	Poland	100
3	Peru	100
4	Pakistan	100
5	Malawi	100
6	Kazakhstan	100
7	Uganda	100
8	Costa Rica	75
9	Lithuania	75
10	Turkey	75
11	Thailand	75
12	Bangladesh	75
13	Rwanda	75
14	Guatemala	75
15	Jordan	75
16	Bulgaria	75
17	Kenya	75
18	Nigeria	75
19	Latvia	75
20	Angola	50
21	Argentina	50
22	Armenia	50
23	Azerbaijan	50
24	Belarus	50
25	Benin	50
26	Bosnia and Herzegovina	50
27	Sri Lanka	50
28	Ukraine	50
29	Cameroon	50
30	Chile	50
31	China	50
32	Colombia	50
33	Brazil	50
34	Ecuador	50
35	Egypt	50
36	Lebanon	50
37	Macedonia	50
38	Algeria	50
39	Mongolia	50
40	Philippines	50
41	Russia	50
42	Timor-Leste	50
43	South Africa	50
44	Cambodia	25
45	Nepal	25
46	Nicaragua	25
47	Iraq	25
48	Indonesia	25
49	Moldova	25
50	Romania	25
51	Mexico	25
52	Ghana	25
53	Sierra Leone	25
54	Morocco	25
55	Mozambique	25
56	St. Vincent and the Grenadines	25
57	Tajikistan	25
58	Tanzania	25
59	Georgia	25
60	Serbia	25
61	Ethiopia	25
62	Liberia	25
63	Venezuela	25
64	Vietnam	25
65	Yemen	25
66	Burundi	0
67	Kyrgyzstan	0
68	India	0
69	Senegal	0
70	Montenegro	0
71	Somalia	0
72	Democratic Republic of the Congo	0
73	Vanuatu	0
74	West Bank and Gaza	0
75	Zimbabwe	0

Country Comparison Graph

Encyclopedia of the Nations